Corruption Hurts Many Parts of Afghanistan’s Development: SIGAR

SIGAR in the report mentioned that without the political will to address these challenges, including resource shortfalls at anti-corruption institutions, the seeming impunity of powerful individuals, and declining activity at the corruption courts, transformative change will remain elusive.
The report referenced an anti-corruption strategy that the Afghan government initiated, saying: “SIGAR determined that the Afghan government met 57 of 76 benchmarks, or about 75 percent, due by June 2019.”
It said the International donors and Afghan civil society organizations remained concerned about the strategy’s revisions and implementation; Specifically, officials from international donor and civil society organizations we spoke with were concerned about the lack of resources provided to the Access to Information Commission, the creation of multiple benchmarks for the establishment of the Palace Ombudsman, the lack of clarity about the Deputy Attorney General for Anti-Corruption’s roles and responsibilities, and the delay in making the Anti-Corruption Commission operational by appointing commissioners.
SIGAR found that the Afghan government met some of the anti-corruption benchmarks contained in the Afghanistan Compact, a mechanism for compiling the Afghan government’s commitments and monitoring their implementation.”SIGAR’s May 2018 audit report contained six matters for consideration for the Afghan government that would increase the efficacy of its anti-corruption efforts. Of the six matters, the Afghan government concurred or partially concurred with all but one,” the report reads.
“Despite this progress, the Afghan government continued to face significant challenges fighting corruption and its key anti-corruption institutions,” the report added.