Hojjat-ul-Islam wal-Muslimin Seyyed Isa Hussaini Mazari, the general director of the Tebyan Cultural and Social Activities Center, attended the center's representative office in Qom Province/Province and met and talked with a group of its officials and staff.
Publish dateWednesday 24 August 2022 - 15:26
Story Code : 257585
It was brought up in a meeting attended by officials and staff of the Tebyan Center office in Qom;
Who guarantees that there is a better alternative than the Islamic Emirate?
The interaction policy of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate was seriously supported
Afghan Voice Agency (AVA) - Qom: At the beginning of this meeting, Hojjat-ul-Islam wal-Muslimin Hussaini Mazari said; The priority of the Tebyan Center's offices abroad is to enlighten the society regarding the situation inside Afghanistan, and therefore, the ability of the employees of these offices should be optimally used, both in the virtual space and in the real field.
Hussaini Mazari said about the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate: at the beginning of the re-establishment of the Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan, the Tebyan Center had a policy of opposition. As it has been in the past twenty years, but after consulting with friends inside and outside the country, for the sake of protecting the interests of the people, this center took the path of interaction, which there are several reasons in this field.
He said: The first reason for interacting with the Islamic Emirate was to be with the people and support them. Because if the issue of serving the people inside Afghanistan is discussed, it was necessary to be present inside the country and this could only be done by interacting with the Islamic Emirate.
This religious scholar, referring to the fact that this interaction was to preserve values and if we had chosen another way other than interaction, like other parties and groups outside Afghanistan, we would not have been able to do any service for the people, he added: The offices of the Tebyan center with the approach Constructive interaction has always been active and in the recent period of his presence in Kabul, he has met hundreds of legal and real personalities, which highlights the influence of this center as the only active institution for everyone.
The head of Tebyan Center considered the second factor of interaction of this center with the Islamic Emirate as the common position of the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate in establishing an Islamic narrative on all government structures and said: Although there are differences in the details of the formation of this narrative, in general, the center's belief Tebyan and Islamic Emirate share this approach.
This expert on political issues named the third reason for the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate as confrontation with America and added that both currents have an anti-American view and at the general level of the Islamic Emirate, there is a view of enmity with the United States, a clear example of which is the creation of a symbol Jerusalem is in Kabul, which is in opposition to Israel, and we all know that Israel is the red line of the West led by America.
He called the fourth factor of the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Emirate as the anti-ISIS policy of the Islamic Emirate and said that another common position of the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate is in the hostility to ISIS; Because ISIS is the enemy of both the Emirate and the Shiites, so the way to interact with the Islamic Emirate is important to destroy ISIS.
Hussaini Mazari considered the fifth reason for the interaction to be opposition to Salafism on the part of the Islamic Emirate and added: The Islamic Emirate hates Salafism as much as it hates ISIS, and these two aspects are common with the Tebyan center.
Hojjatul-Islam wal-Muslimeen Hussaini Mazari considered the sixth reason for interacting with the Islamic Emirate to be its anti-corruption and said: since the Islamic Emirate came to power, the fight against moral, administrative, etc. corruption has started. While in the previous government, moral, administrative and economic corruptions had reached their peak; Westerners were helping to promote and spread corruption under different projects. But today corruption is disappearing.
The head of the Afghan Voice news agency said that the seventh reason for interaction with the Islamic Emirate is the fight against hijab and the emphasis on wearing the Islamic hijab, and the eighth reason is the Emirate's confrontation with cultural vulgarities, while cultural vulgarities were rampant during the republic, but now this phenomenon There is no news, and the ninth reason for the interaction with the Islamic Emirate is the denial of war, and in principle, the Tebyan center does not deeply believe in war, what is more, the 43-year war in Afghanistan did not have any winners, and it will not have any benefit now, and it is not good, the war of the past 43 years is nothing but the misery of the nation. It has not brought anything else.
Therefore, by interacting with the Islamic Emirate, more peace and stability can be established and positive and effective work can be done against the act of creating war.
This expert on political issues listed the lack of acceptance of the war by the people inside as the tenth reason for the Tebyan Center's interaction with the Islamic Emirate and said that today in Afghanistan, no one wants to go to war. There is no religious or political motivation for war, and the occurrence of war does not have a regional reception, and the international powers, including the United States, are caught up in the Ukraine crisis and the Taiwan dispute, and their efforts to start a civil war in our country are fruitless, although from a political and intelligence point of view, They are very busy with the Chinese conspiracy against our people.
Hussaini Mazari stated that the eleventh reason for the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate is the lack of a better alternative than the Islamic Emirate and added that there is currently no better alternative than the Islamic Emirate.
He asked the audience with a critical question: What did those who were in power in the last twenty years and had military and political power do? How can they regain people's trust? On the other hand, there is no longer the spirit of basking in the political leaders of the past.
Only ISIS and other terrorist groups remain. If the Islamic Emirate is weakened, these groups will emerge as substitutes, which will definitely harm the people and our country, so that the people do not get caught in the clutches of terrorist groups, including ISIS.
He further responded to the criticisms of the Islamic Emirate and gave three major answers in response to three serious questions.
In response to the question that they say that the Islamic Emirate is a killer, this religious scholar said: Communists, Mujahideen and technocrats all killed people. Didn't the heads of the Shiite parties start civil wars? If the discussion of criticism is related to the question that the Islamic Emirate is a criminal. If interaction with the leaders of past regimes was good, why is it bad now?!
In response to the second question whether the Islamic Emirate is dependent on Pakistan or not, he said: First of all, it is not and the heads of the Emirate deny this issue. On the other hand, the existence of border conflicts is proof that there is no dependence. Now, on the assumption that they are dependent, unless the previous system was dependent on 46 infidel countries, not all of them have foreign dependencies, and in this sense, criticizing the Islamic Emirate that is dependent on a country, even if it is Islamic, is wrong.
In response to the third criticism that it is said that the Islamic Emirate is strict towards women, he added: Today, women are at home. During the republic, under the title of empowerment and hundreds of words and titles, they wanted to strip women. Currently, the condition of women is far better than the previous period, but in the field of education and training of women, no one agrees with the restrictions, and the Islamic Emirate should also pay attention to this issue.
He went on to say that with all these descriptions, analysis and reasons, the Tebyan Center has nearly 70% in common with the Islamic Emirate, and 30% is the ambiguity of some issues on the part of the Islamic Emirate, which we expect to be clarified.
Hussaini Mazari said about the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate: at the beginning of the re-establishment of the Islamic Emirate in Afghanistan, the Tebyan Center had a policy of opposition. As it has been in the past twenty years, but after consulting with friends inside and outside the country, for the sake of protecting the interests of the people, this center took the path of interaction, which there are several reasons in this field.
He said: The first reason for interacting with the Islamic Emirate was to be with the people and support them. Because if the issue of serving the people inside Afghanistan is discussed, it was necessary to be present inside the country and this could only be done by interacting with the Islamic Emirate.
This religious scholar, referring to the fact that this interaction was to preserve values and if we had chosen another way other than interaction, like other parties and groups outside Afghanistan, we would not have been able to do any service for the people, he added: The offices of the Tebyan center with the approach Constructive interaction has always been active and in the recent period of his presence in Kabul, he has met hundreds of legal and real personalities, which highlights the influence of this center as the only active institution for everyone.
The head of Tebyan Center considered the second factor of interaction of this center with the Islamic Emirate as the common position of the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate in establishing an Islamic narrative on all government structures and said: Although there are differences in the details of the formation of this narrative, in general, the center's belief Tebyan and Islamic Emirate share this approach.
This expert on political issues named the third reason for the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate as confrontation with America and added that both currents have an anti-American view and at the general level of the Islamic Emirate, there is a view of enmity with the United States, a clear example of which is the creation of a symbol Jerusalem is in Kabul, which is in opposition to Israel, and we all know that Israel is the red line of the West led by America.
He called the fourth factor of the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Emirate as the anti-ISIS policy of the Islamic Emirate and said that another common position of the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate is in the hostility to ISIS; Because ISIS is the enemy of both the Emirate and the Shiites, so the way to interact with the Islamic Emirate is important to destroy ISIS.
Hussaini Mazari considered the fifth reason for the interaction to be opposition to Salafism on the part of the Islamic Emirate and added: The Islamic Emirate hates Salafism as much as it hates ISIS, and these two aspects are common with the Tebyan center.
Hojjatul-Islam wal-Muslimeen Hussaini Mazari considered the sixth reason for interacting with the Islamic Emirate to be its anti-corruption and said: since the Islamic Emirate came to power, the fight against moral, administrative, etc. corruption has started. While in the previous government, moral, administrative and economic corruptions had reached their peak; Westerners were helping to promote and spread corruption under different projects. But today corruption is disappearing.
The head of the Afghan Voice news agency said that the seventh reason for interaction with the Islamic Emirate is the fight against hijab and the emphasis on wearing the Islamic hijab, and the eighth reason is the Emirate's confrontation with cultural vulgarities, while cultural vulgarities were rampant during the republic, but now this phenomenon There is no news, and the ninth reason for the interaction with the Islamic Emirate is the denial of war, and in principle, the Tebyan center does not deeply believe in war, what is more, the 43-year war in Afghanistan did not have any winners, and it will not have any benefit now, and it is not good, the war of the past 43 years is nothing but the misery of the nation. It has not brought anything else.
Therefore, by interacting with the Islamic Emirate, more peace and stability can be established and positive and effective work can be done against the act of creating war.
This expert on political issues listed the lack of acceptance of the war by the people inside as the tenth reason for the Tebyan Center's interaction with the Islamic Emirate and said that today in Afghanistan, no one wants to go to war. There is no religious or political motivation for war, and the occurrence of war does not have a regional reception, and the international powers, including the United States, are caught up in the Ukraine crisis and the Taiwan dispute, and their efforts to start a civil war in our country are fruitless, although from a political and intelligence point of view, They are very busy with the Chinese conspiracy against our people.
Hussaini Mazari stated that the eleventh reason for the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate is the lack of a better alternative than the Islamic Emirate and added that there is currently no better alternative than the Islamic Emirate.
He asked the audience with a critical question: What did those who were in power in the last twenty years and had military and political power do? How can they regain people's trust? On the other hand, there is no longer the spirit of basking in the political leaders of the past.
Only ISIS and other terrorist groups remain. If the Islamic Emirate is weakened, these groups will emerge as substitutes, which will definitely harm the people and our country, so that the people do not get caught in the clutches of terrorist groups, including ISIS.
He further responded to the criticisms of the Islamic Emirate and gave three major answers in response to three serious questions.
In response to the question that they say that the Islamic Emirate is a killer, this religious scholar said: Communists, Mujahideen and technocrats all killed people. Didn't the heads of the Shiite parties start civil wars? If the discussion of criticism is related to the question that the Islamic Emirate is a criminal. If interaction with the leaders of past regimes was good, why is it bad now?!
In response to the second question whether the Islamic Emirate is dependent on Pakistan or not, he said: First of all, it is not and the heads of the Emirate deny this issue. On the other hand, the existence of border conflicts is proof that there is no dependence. Now, on the assumption that they are dependent, unless the previous system was dependent on 46 infidel countries, not all of them have foreign dependencies, and in this sense, criticizing the Islamic Emirate that is dependent on a country, even if it is Islamic, is wrong.
In response to the third criticism that it is said that the Islamic Emirate is strict towards women, he added: Today, women are at home. During the republic, under the title of empowerment and hundreds of words and titles, they wanted to strip women. Currently, the condition of women is far better than the previous period, but in the field of education and training of women, no one agrees with the restrictions, and the Islamic Emirate should also pay attention to this issue.
He went on to say that with all these descriptions, analysis and reasons, the Tebyan Center has nearly 70% in common with the Islamic Emirate, and 30% is the ambiguity of some issues on the part of the Islamic Emirate, which we expect to be clarified.
avapress.net/vdcbwzb5srhbssp.4eur.html
Tags
Top hits
