Hojjatul-Islam wal-Muslimin Sayed Isa Hussaini Mazari, in a meeting with a group of officials and staff of the Tebyan Center in Mashhad, emphasized that there is currently no better alternative for the Islamic Emirate and said: the resistance forces were in power for two decades and the facilities and equipment and They had major administrative and national responsibilities, but they proved that they are weak in terms of responsibility and management. Also, they have been metamorphosed intellectually, religiously and politically. During the past 20 years, the West has worked on their beliefs and political knowledge and made them politically confined to family affairs. In terms of belief, they don't have the motivation and religious love of the past 20 or 25 years to come and be present in the trenches and work towards the direction and organization of the people, so considering these two problems, it is not possible for the resistance front to be a better alternative for the Taliban.
Publish dateMonday 5 September 2022 - 09:19
Story Code : 258117
Hojjat al-Islam wal-Muslimin Hussaini Mazari:
The resistance front is not a suitable alternative for the Islamic Emirate/ we interact with the government, but we do not deviate from our intellectual and religious principles
Afghan Voice Agency (AVA) - Holy Mashhad: Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimin Sayed Isa Hussaini Mazari, at the beginning of his speech, mentioned the necessity of being with the people and the need of the people for the presence of Islamic organizations on the scene as the first reason for the interaction of the Tebyan Center with the Islamic Emirate and said: According to the approach of our intellectual and cultural activities and social work, we need to be with the people. People also need organizations and elites of Afghanistan, especially Islamic and religious organizations, to be by their side, especially inside Afghanistan. Therefore, this approach requires us to interact with the existing government.
Hussaini Mazari listed the anti-American and anti-ISIS approach and Salafist and Wahhabist thinking, as well as the anti-corruption, moral and cultural practices, including aspects of the common positions between the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate, as the second reason for interaction: We are not saying that the emirate does not have problems. There are many issues in which we have differences of opinion, some of which may be completely against us and some of which may be relatively problematic. But we believe that when we have about 70% in common with them, the rest can be solved by talking, by being on stage, with intellectual and cultural activities and efforts.
Emphasizing the lack of a solution to the war in Afghanistan, this political analyst explained the third reason for the interaction between the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate and said: There has been war and conflict in Afghanistan for forty-three years, so which side has benefited from this war? All parties, especially the people, lost 100%. Currently, the war is not welcomed in the country because there is no motivation and belief in it. From a regional point of view, countries are also looking for security in Afghanistan. At the world level, there is no motivation for war in Afghanistan, and even the United States, as the most important claimant in this issue, does not have the previous ability to intervene, and Afghanistan is not the priority for its intervention at the moment.
The lack of a better alternative for the Islamic Emirate was Hussaini Mazari's fourth reason for adopting the engagement approach, which he pointed out and said: "There is no better alternative than the Taliban in the country now." Assuming there are internal, regional and global fields of war, but what are you fighting for? Which alternative will rule instead of the Taliban? There is definitely no better alternative than the Taliban. There is an alternative that is worse than the Taliban, but there is no better than the Taliban. Some may refer to the resistance front as a better alternative to the Islamic Emirate, but the resistance forces cannot be a good alternative to the Taliban due to two major and important weaknesses.
The head of Tebyan Center, in addition to the above article, noted: The resistance forces were in power for two decades and had facilities and equipment and great administrative and national responsibilities, but they proved that they are weak in terms of responsibility and management. Also, they have undergone an intellectual, religious and political transformation. During the last 20 years, the West worked on their beliefs and political knowledge and made them politically confined to family affairs. In terms of belief, they don't have the motivation and religious love of the past 20 or 25 years to come and be present in the trenches and work towards the direction and organization of the people, so considering these two problems, it is not possible for the resistance front to be a better alternative for the Taliban.
Hussaini Mazari considered the filling of the organizational vacuum of the Shiite movement in the country as an important reason for the presence of the Tebyan Center in the field and said: the approach that the Tebyan Center chose and based on this approach was present in Afghanistan and suffered all the adversities and dangers that remained in the scene. It is for the purpose of providing, compensating and filling the organizational vacuum of the Shiite movement.
He added: It is for these reasons that we stayed in Afghanistan and we are interested in continuing to stay in Afghanistan by God's will and bearing all conditions and hardships. While we believe in interaction, we emphasize our line of thought and principles and until this moment we have not deviated from our intellectual, religious and political principles and we have remained seriously on the same principles and lines.
The head of the Tebyan Center emphasized that raising positive points does not mean being the speaker of the Islamic Emirate, and said: We are not the speaker of the Taliban. If we raise the positive points, it does not mean speaking loudly. We have a news agency and we don't have hidden things, if we say the positive points, see if these positive points are in the Taliban or not? When we say don't fall into the trap of Western propaganda and don't propagate against the Islamic Emirate, it does not mean absolute and blind support for the Taliban or the Emirate. Today, an unequal war between the East and the West has been waged against the entire people of Afghanistan, and everyone is involved in this war and unequal troubles. Therefore, cultural and organizational forces should enlighten in this field.
Hussaini Mazari listed the anti-American and anti-ISIS approach and Salafist and Wahhabist thinking, as well as the anti-corruption, moral and cultural practices, including aspects of the common positions between the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate, as the second reason for interaction: We are not saying that the emirate does not have problems. There are many issues in which we have differences of opinion, some of which may be completely against us and some of which may be relatively problematic. But we believe that when we have about 70% in common with them, the rest can be solved by talking, by being on stage, with intellectual and cultural activities and efforts.
Emphasizing the lack of a solution to the war in Afghanistan, this political analyst explained the third reason for the interaction between the Tebyan Center and the Islamic Emirate and said: There has been war and conflict in Afghanistan for forty-three years, so which side has benefited from this war? All parties, especially the people, lost 100%. Currently, the war is not welcomed in the country because there is no motivation and belief in it. From a regional point of view, countries are also looking for security in Afghanistan. At the world level, there is no motivation for war in Afghanistan, and even the United States, as the most important claimant in this issue, does not have the previous ability to intervene, and Afghanistan is not the priority for its intervention at the moment.
The lack of a better alternative for the Islamic Emirate was Hussaini Mazari's fourth reason for adopting the engagement approach, which he pointed out and said: "There is no better alternative than the Taliban in the country now." Assuming there are internal, regional and global fields of war, but what are you fighting for? Which alternative will rule instead of the Taliban? There is definitely no better alternative than the Taliban. There is an alternative that is worse than the Taliban, but there is no better than the Taliban. Some may refer to the resistance front as a better alternative to the Islamic Emirate, but the resistance forces cannot be a good alternative to the Taliban due to two major and important weaknesses.
The head of Tebyan Center, in addition to the above article, noted: The resistance forces were in power for two decades and had facilities and equipment and great administrative and national responsibilities, but they proved that they are weak in terms of responsibility and management. Also, they have undergone an intellectual, religious and political transformation. During the last 20 years, the West worked on their beliefs and political knowledge and made them politically confined to family affairs. In terms of belief, they don't have the motivation and religious love of the past 20 or 25 years to come and be present in the trenches and work towards the direction and organization of the people, so considering these two problems, it is not possible for the resistance front to be a better alternative for the Taliban.
Hussaini Mazari considered the filling of the organizational vacuum of the Shiite movement in the country as an important reason for the presence of the Tebyan Center in the field and said: the approach that the Tebyan Center chose and based on this approach was present in Afghanistan and suffered all the adversities and dangers that remained in the scene. It is for the purpose of providing, compensating and filling the organizational vacuum of the Shiite movement.
He added: It is for these reasons that we stayed in Afghanistan and we are interested in continuing to stay in Afghanistan by God's will and bearing all conditions and hardships. While we believe in interaction, we emphasize our line of thought and principles and until this moment we have not deviated from our intellectual, religious and political principles and we have remained seriously on the same principles and lines.
The head of the Tebyan Center emphasized that raising positive points does not mean being the speaker of the Islamic Emirate, and said: We are not the speaker of the Taliban. If we raise the positive points, it does not mean speaking loudly. We have a news agency and we don't have hidden things, if we say the positive points, see if these positive points are in the Taliban or not? When we say don't fall into the trap of Western propaganda and don't propagate against the Islamic Emirate, it does not mean absolute and blind support for the Taliban or the Emirate. Today, an unequal war between the East and the West has been waged against the entire people of Afghanistan, and everyone is involved in this war and unequal troubles. Therefore, cultural and organizational forces should enlighten in this field.
avapress.net/vdcdfj0x5yt0kf6.em2y.html
Tags
Top hits
