Ghani’s aids are putting false words in his statements. They wrongly compare the history, makes imaginary Wazir Akbar Khan, and vilify about Shah Shujah. They quip about Ghalji history against Durrani and the bodyguards of a security firm.

AVA- Who is Ashraf Ghani without America? What can he do and how long will he last? We all know the answer of these questions and Ashraf Ghani knows well. But why has he entered in a process of complaining and hostility with America? First, he innocently likened himself to Dr. Najibullah. Days later, he said he is not Ya’qub Khan to sign another Gandamak treaty. He has already said that he is completing the unfinished project of Amanullah (Khan).
Ghani’s aids are putting false words in his statements. They wrongly compare the history, makes imaginary Wazir Akbar Khan, and vilify about Shah Shujah. They quip about Ghalji history against Durrani and the bodyguards of a security firm. And more surprisingly, these days, the word “patriotism” has gotten a lot of high-frequency on the twitter pages of Ghani’s aids. The senior advisory team is thinking of reviving the memories of Wazir Akbar Khan in Ghani’s strategic propagandas (!). Rallies in the provinces and live television broadcasts. Does anyone know what the benefits of these things are? Ashraf Ghani’s passionate advisers have forced him into hostility with the United States.
Anyone who has only read two credentials in the history of Afghanistan, exactly knows where current Afghanistan was formed and under which treaties. Ashraf Ghani is well acquainted with the contemporary history of Afghanistan, and knows that Dr. Najibullah was not tricked, and there was no way left but to accept the Benon Sevan’s plan (United Nations Special Envoy for Afghanistan at the time of Dr. Najib). Ya’qub Khan was only supported by the British during his Father’s imprisonment years, and had no choice but to sign the Gandamak treaty, particularly after the failure of his father’s army in the second “Afghan – English” war.
How can Ashraf Ghani complete the project of Amanullah while precisely repeating the same mistake Amanullah did which paved the ground to his fall. Amanullah had to choose one of these; the secular-based reforms sponsored by Britain or keeping himself beside Mujahidin. But the young king was moving against the two ways, the anti-colonial hero and Ghazi against Britain. Ashraf Ghani also survived against Mujahidin only by relying on the US support. But against America, will he resort to Russia? Like Amir Dost M. Khan. Russia did not accept Dost M. Khan and he died in Mazar-e Sharif, or Shah Amanullah sought refuge in Italy and the former British foreign minister said: “the deposed Shah does not have even one supporter in Afghanistan”. Ashraf Ghani is the professor of Afghanistan’s history to prevent its repetition for his own fate.