Code 252281
PublishDate: Monday, November 8, 2021 10:20

Before Collapse, Plan Was in Place for Inclusive Govt: Khalilzad

Zalmay Khalilzad, the former US envoy for Afghanistan peace, in an exclusive interview with TOLOnews’ Lotfullah Najafizada, says that days before the Kabul collapse, it was decided that all parties should agree to an inclusive government.

Afghan Voice Agency (AVA)_According to , a few days before Kabul’s collapse he was in where he talked with Mullah Abdul Ghani , the current PM Deputy of the Islamic Emirate, and they agreed to hold talks with the Afghan politicians and a delegation from the then-Afghan government on forming an inclusive interim government.

Khalilzad said the Taliban had agreed to not enter Kabul until an inclusive government was formed.

“It was agreed that the Taliban forces would not enter Kabul and a number of their forces who were in the city would leave the capital. In the meantime, a delegation from the government was set to visit Doha and to form an agreement with the Taliban on an inclusive government within two weeks,” Khalilzad said.  

According to Khalilzad, it was decided that any decision the delegation would make in Doha about an inclusive government would be final and Ashraf Ghani had accepted this.

The scheduled talks, however, did not take place as Ghani left Kabul on August 15 and later in the day the Taliban forces entered the city.

Khalilzad, however, said both the former Afghan government and the Taliban are responsible for the failure of the intra-Afghan talks intended to bring peace to the country.

According to Khalilzad, the Doha agreement provided a golden opportunity for peace, but the conflicting parties failed to use the opportunity.

“Although the Doha deal and the joint declaration in Kabul on the same day provided a golden opportunity, unfortunately the warring parties did not use it. In my view, both sides are responsible for the failure,” he added.

According to Khalilzad, both sides wanted peace on their own terms and did not compromise to allow a middle way. “For me, Afghanistan leaders, including Taliban and non-Taliban, are more responsible because they did not accept a middle way.”

Khalilzad said US President Joe Biden was disappointed by the Afghans' disagreement and that he preferred a time-based withdrawal instead of a condition-based one. “It was feared that if we condition the on the -Afghan agreement, it was possible that the Afghans would never reach an agreement.”

According to Khalilzad, during the peace talks the US had discussed a power-sharing government with the Taliban, but Ashraf Ghani’s administration was reluctant to form such a government.

“We were talking with the Taliban about a power-sharing government. I made a proposal and soon Kabul released the proposal. Releasing a secret agreement (proposal) that had been given to the government and the Taliban itself meant that the (the government) wanted to damage it,” he said.

Khalilzad said amid the increase in fighting in the months prior to August, the US pressured the Taliban and they agreed to not attack cities and highways. He said the government in Kabul was insisting on an immediate ceasefire.

On the dual inauguration by Ashraf Ghani and following the controversial presidential elections of 2019, Khalilzad said the night before the inauguration he convinced Abdullah to seek a solution and they went to the presidential palace to solve the problem.

He said Abdullah showed flexibility toward forming a power-sharing government, but Ghani rejected such a government.

Khalilzad said was a threat for the former government, and it is a threat for the Islamic Emirate too, and he rejected accusations that both sides had ties with Daesh. According to Khalilzad, in the past the former government was accusing the Taliban of having ties with Daesh and the Taliban was labeling Daesh as a tool in the hands of the government.

Tags

Your comment

Related posts

Latest news